/classical/

Biber edition

This thread is for the discussion of music in the Western (European) classical tradition, as well as classical instrument-playing.

How do I get into classical?

This link has resources including audio courses, textbooks and selections of recordings to help you start to understand and appreciate classical music:
pastebin.com/NBEp2VFh

Previously, on /classical/:

H.I.F.Biber.jpg - 1200x1440, 793.57K

Justinianus Biber

Western (European) classical tradition

that means no amerimutts

Thank fuck

Nah

not sure what this has to do with Western (European) /classical/, maybe try instead?

Mighty fine evening to bust a nut, I agree

what about The Gobsmacker?

Share your well thought-out opinions on Jan Václav Dusík or forever be a gay rastafarian

idiots3.jpg - 380x291, 23.71K

Backhaus <3

liar

nada.png - 314x269, 18.07K

What the fuck did you expect? Rattle is a disappointment 99% of the time.

Rattle's style with Sibelius seemed interesting, and it's with the Berlin Philharmonic, my favorite orchestra. What sucks is it's not even an issue of mawkishness or micromanaging the details like you'd expect from a poor Rattle recording, it's just... zzzzzzz. dull dull dull

what about the Ballbuster?

is that the Italian ballet about a grocer in Chicago who doesn't want to pay the mafia's protection fee?

it could be.

Ooooh but when that 1% hits though

sr.jpg - 599x591, 163.15K

he's good at Szymanowski, yeah.

and his Wagner recordings are actually surprisingly adept insofar as the orchestral accompaniment is concerned. unfortunately it's marred by completely dogshit singing.

would also give a thumbs up to his Haydn Creation
youtube.com/watch?v=nQX66pZQ-tM

Pretty small minded of you

music for a splitting tooth-ache?

kek, this is making me positively queasy

Good

favorite Brahms cycle?

Walter

Beinum's if I ignore the fact that half of it is in mono.

But there isn't really one singular cycle that nails it for every symphony for me.

New York or Columbia?

Pic related. Runners-up in no particular orden: Jochum, Solti, Abbado, Dorati

fh.jpg - 1000x1000, 454.01K

Levine (Chicago and Vienna), Sanderling (Dresden and Berlin), Giulini (LA and Vienna), Karajan, Jochum/Klemperer

There's lots of great ones though, Brahms' symphonies are pieces most people do at least competently, and plenty do well, so it's really just about finding your own personal favorite touches and details in performances, hence why either combination of cycles from these performers are among my favorites because it's more in the spirit of how they approach it than any specific one time, inspired night of performance.

Who was a better symponist: Haydn or Mozart? For Mozart I of course mean his last four symphonies, since those are formally his best.

The school I work at has started playing Tchaikovsky in the student bathrooms to stop them from congregating during class time.

That's pretty based.

Mozart surpassed Haydn in his thirties but he died soon afterwards.

have you considered working at a school that doesn't have niggers?

In all honestly, listening through a set of Haydn's London Symphonies, nice as they are, it can be difficult to differentiate them; sometimes I have to look at my file/video history to make sure which one I actually listened to last time so I can pick a different one this time, lol. With Mozart I don't have that problem, because his melodies and ideas and construction are genius.

That said, Haydn has more I listen to, but yeah, for quality Mozart wins easily.

What about ignoring melodic invention. Is it your opinion that the form of Mozart's late symphonies surpass that of Haydn's?

Is it your opinion that the form of Mozart's late symphonies surpass that of Haydn's?

yes.

Is this recording from the 50s?

It literally says on the cover on the bottom-right, anon... plus Backhaus is eternal.

live in Berlin, 1969

They're white. Just poor.