What about him causes so much seethe?

Question

What about him causes so much seethe?

Married an ugly szhico bug

Moved to the US just to get killed by some FED fat faggot

Yeah that's a big nope for me

Beating your wife and then declaring that you've killed Jesus doesn't exactly bid well for the public image,but beyond that they're corny and dated. Also quite bland desu. They tried to ad flavor to it but other bands from that era who were far more interesting.

Yeah the Beatles biggest hits were all bought and produced by their director
They went town by town buying the best songs
There's no way 4 cockheads could come up with do many beautiful songs
Overrated band

He was a communist who lived in a penthouse apartment on Central Park.

I enjoy his wife beating

John Lennon remains the greatest Pop songwriter to this day. Maybe this is the root of all the seethe: people can’t scape his influence.

Being one of the best songwriters of the 20th century

His wife beating was exceptional

Quicksilver Messenger Service are unironically 1000% times better songwritters,had more interesting floaty/abstract soundscapes,and had cooler guitar solos.

the glasses

I’m a faggot

i love pop boybands!

Do you have a discord? I'd love to show you my John Lennon phone background.

Idk I think loveless is a great album

Can I beat your wife?

Uhhhhhh I don't actually care if it was "really them who made it" desu,I just didn't enjoy the music itself. I will say that if I were to guess Ringo specifically had less creative control than anyone else did. Like I'm assuming both George Martin and Ravni Shankar were being consulted before Ringo or Paul were. George Harrison and John Lennon definetely had their input taken seriously. Ringo tried to keep it a boyband and they told him to fuck off and that it would hurt their potential artistic legitimacy or whatever. Did not prevent John Lennon being allowed to make them do soft rock albums. They just didn't want Ringo fucking with anything prettymuch. It wasn't the label thinking they'd "lose fans if they sold out" because they actually literally did start as a boyband,it's that they saw Ringo as a liability they had been stuck with. A requirement for working with John Lennon,George Harrison,and various "Fifth Beatles" like Martin was. I think as far as the record label was concerned John Lennon was verymuch allowed as much control as he wanted but they verymuch kept George Martin around as an artistic collaborator and gave him significant input. I think saying he was a more important part of The Beatles than Ringo or Paul is accurate. John Lennon was also the more marketable one as a boyband and never hit the same level creatively. I think if the record label could have they probably would just replaced Ringo with Ravni Shankar or George Martin by force probably even. I wouldn't say that John Lennon and George Harrison weren't given ample creative input though. It's more those other two who were essentially expected to fuck off a significant chunk of the time. After 66 or 67 or so nobody really gave a fuck about Ringo or Paul. They were like a weird leftover from when The Beatles actually WERE a boyband whereas even if George Martin started as essentially a commercial songwriter he was more willing to evolve than Paul or Ringo so yk.

And he didn't punch the bug
He literally beat the shit out of a 10/10 white model
Was he gay?

The issue wasn't that they were a pop boyband. They had some pop boyband stuff but Jo teenage girl wants revolution 9 playing at their birthday party and realistically a lot of other psych rock bands started this way,it's that said other bands were better.

He literally beat the shit out of a 10/10 white model

Based, smug bitch probably asked for it

random bullshit

yeah?

I hope you know Nico jobs to Jackson Browne

It's like rock music's version of atheism.

Doesn't quite answer the question

It's the hypocrisy

Beating Yoko Ono was a public service.

I am aware. You've only listened to Chelsea Girls haven't you?

His nice long hair

him being 100% right about women, and beatlefags living in too much cognitive dissonance to admit he's correct.

You have no fucking idea what you're talking about. George having more creative input than Paul, in what fucking world.

In the latter part of The Beatles career he started writing really good punky songs. Stuff like "Yer Blues" and "Cold Turkey", That 1969 live album, the stuff he made with Yoko. That's usually what filters people.

This. The 4 chord boyband pop of "Yer Blues" and "Cold Turkey" is tough.

Not really that punky lol. The Velvet Underground had a far greater influence moving forward as did The Who as did The Kinks as did Love probably. Beatles Fanboys are coping when they say that stuff.

The only reason you act so brave is because you never say what you actually listen to.

Quicksilver Messenger Service

Did you literally just compare some 3rd rate San Francisco psych band to THE FUCKING BEATLES…. idc if I’m taking the bait, that’s the most retarded thing I’ve seen on Anon Babble yet.
The Quicksilver Messenger Service we’re getting absolutely dummied by Iron Butterfly, Vanilla Fudge, Blue Cheer, Jefferson Airplane… hell, even the first Moby Grape album is better than the QMS’s entire discography — HAPPY TRAILS has some interesting guitar playing going on… and not a single memorable melody; that’s what Tom Verlaine and Richard Lloyd are for.