Why would he say this?

They need to keep reaffirming their sexuality to their peers due to insecurity. THE RAT RACE NEVER RESTS

I get your trying to be witty and funny but it's common sense that Jesus is literally God. Not one man is hated more than christ and not a single person besides jesus has fulfilled Daniel 9:24-27

jesus has fulfilled Daniel

ok go on.... what did daniel do to jesus..

Sufjan bros how do we cope that our boy got BLACKED

youtube.com/watch?v=QCwyiJmaba8

balderdash

the ending Daniel 9 is about the Antichrist, not the Lord Christ Jesus (as per all sacred scholarship for the last 1500 years)
tl;dr asspulls work better on rẽddit, anons

This dude has seriously fallen so far away from the Holy Spirit. If you wanna be an open Christian in the entertainment biz, they’re gonna make you distort and twist your beliefs. Sufjans greed and lust got the best of him. Funny how the further from God he got, the worse his music has become. He hasn’t made anything truly great in 10 years.

Isaiah 7:14

Jesus? You must truly be a man of wealth and taste.

Thought this was that gay nigga from Xiu Xiu

Why would he say this?

Probably as a joke or to make christcuck chuds seethe

As a gay, you are pushed into questioning a lot of things, which makes you come to the realization that religion is bullshit much faster than other people

as a gay you were molested at a young age

why are you thinking of molesting children man wtf is wrong with u

Jesus was fucking Mary Magdalene, but history has tried to erase anything positive about her from the Bible including her book.

Gays are disgusting so obviously he would say something disgusting like this.
Makes them feel better to think others are no better than them and their filthy lifestyle.

This is like when people call LOTR gay

That's simply not true
A lot of people who are gay, you can notice it in them from very young age (hence why they often get bullied in school).
And by noticing I mean that it's physically obvious in them that they're a bit less like their own sex than average
This is not caused by an event like getting molested. It's obviously genetic or due to something that happened during gestation
That said, molestation DOES take a huge toll on gays in particularly because it left them thinking that the reason why they're gay is because of what happened to them, leading to a harder time accepting themselves
Gays are born gay to be honest
Ergo, nobody can turn gay just as nobody can turn straight
This destroys a lot of conservachud causes and talking points, since their whole argument is that homosexuality is something that can be promoted or propagated

t-th-think of the chillun!!!

People who hate gays love to believe in "explanations" like what you just said because it reduces the validity the existence of the people that they hate
And that's all that christianity, religion and other moral codes based on intolerance and fear do, no? Just trying to invalidate the reality of the human condition and imposing unnatural moral requirements on people

Volcel. Mary Magdalene wanted his nuts.

I engaged in some same sex activity early on in childhood and I think it had a big influence on my sexuality as I got older. Pretty sure if it never happened I probably would be straight, but I don't really consider what happened to be molestation as it was mutually consensual.

tripfag

redditino pontification

muh chud muh incel

muh christianity bad right guis? christianity is hate and fear? religion too i guess

as an agnostic you should be beaten to death with a brick or stomped out like that bus tranny

That said, molestation DOES take a huge toll on gays in particularly because it left them thinking that the reason why they're gay is because of what happened to them,

so you're saying lots of gays are molested?
children can't consent and the other kid was molesting you, probably because he/she got molested.
even if someone has certain leanings or proclivities, the truth about homosexual relationships and "sex" is that they are destructive and physically harmful.

He craves attention.

kek

Me and my cousin used to suck each others dicks as kids, but I'm pretty sure I'm straight now. No I am not kanye west.

I ain't reading allat, faggot.

Jesus is literally God

Not true

Looks like this guy is still trying to grapple with the fact that he was raised very Christian and is gay. This is what "Impossible Soul" is about.

"The Bible says homosexuality is a sin? Well akshully Jesus was gay!"

No dude. You just like sucking black cock. That has nothing to do with Jesus.

Can't wait until our Lord and savior returns and sends Sufjan and a majority of this thread kicking and screaming back to hell. He's coming. Are you going?

this thread

Faggots are so weird

a guy touched me when I was younger and now I'm gay

Makes no sense.

You just didn't get the memo from the rest of society, due to being isolated from young age.
And psy-oped yourself into believing you're "different".
But that's also society's fault for hiding shit under the carpet and always looking to push it onto the most vulnerable, to pass "it" on so they won't be "it". So it had to be you or whoever doesn't look like fitting in.

it fucks you up to experience sexuality beyond what you are mentally ready for
this basically happened to everyone who used the internet as a child, to some degree.

Skank mode

Nah I don't believe that straight people can somehow become gay. At most you can develop temporary prison-gayness. You need some weird fucked up genes for something to be able to turn you gay.

My theory is that since it was my first every real sexual experience, it created stronger neural pathways relating to the factors that were present. I could have easily become more proportionally straight had it been a girl at the time. Obviously this isn't the case with every person, but you can't just dismiss something as nuanced as the human brain as being black and white.
Me and the other kid were kind of on the same wavelength, so to speak. We were basically playing with our dicks in kind of a joking way, and he was the one that officially pushed the boundary to being something sexual by suggesting we touch our dicks together, which then led to oral. I didn't really have any reservations about it is what strikes me as significant. It was more exciting in a "we could get in trouble" kind of way which was thrilling enough that I don't think the stark sexual connotation of the activity was that important to me. However, he did want to try making out, and that was pretty unpleasant for me. The cherry on top is he's had multiple girlfriends and I've never asked a girl out and am a virgin at 32. I'm most sexually attracted to traps, but I don't think I'd ever fuck one since they're probably all insane, plus man smell.

Kids are basically asexual and any sexual behavior will typically come from modeling the adults around them. This is why kids will sometimes kiss or whatever. This is also why people who care about children don't want to expose them to gay shit. However, it fucks you up to have your dick played with by an adult, or to have your dick sucked by a kid who had his dick played with by an adult.

traps

Nigger you are not gayer than the average coomer.

being gay is just a form of extreme hedonism from fucked up people.
people get the gay from a progression of porn use, too.
maybe some people are born more susceptible to homo shit but nobody is born gay.

children shouldn't get fucked by adults because it might turn them gay and not because fucking children is inherently fucked up

Jesus Christ.

feels wrong to called the Bible and Jesus gay

No shit!! Sufjan has fallen

what? are you a coping faggot? I literally didn't say that at all.
little black boys are getting molested by their obese aunties and that is obviously bad.

Jesus is literally God

I'm definitely a late stage porn addict, but I don't think if I hadn't watched porn as much, or ever, that I would magically not have the sexuality that I have.

Are you retarded?

yet you dont give as much of a shit and you never did because its not gay, which is the part that triggers that little retard alarm in your peanut brain

Well, you would be incorrect. Porn has literally changed sexuality for almost every adult since probably the 1970s. Your age demographic may have gotten it the worst, though, since you were reaching pubescent maturity right around the time high-speed internet became widely available, and porn could be accessed for free with minimal effort. Couple this with an extreme naivety on the part of boomer parents regarding internet use, and you were almost destined to become the homo that you are.

nice strawman, gayboi.
part of opposing the rise of the narrative of homosexuality being just another lifestyle is that it leads to the destruction of families, which leaves more children vulnerable to predation.

I'm sure you know me better than myself. Thanks, doc.

Because of his idiot dad which converted to islam

this hyper-addictive thing that I admitted to being addicted to and has had a tremendous affect on society at large can't have affected me, personally.

lmao

I had already been having fantasies involving my friend many years before ever considering watching gay or tranny porn so your timeline doesn't really make sense. Porn just contextualized the groundwork that had been laid in a different way than I had thought of before, but if those blocks weren't there, then that door may or may not have been opened. Your argument is fine assuming I had more regular exposure to the ideas of homosexuality in porn to influence me before I engaged in any real activity of that kind, which I didn't.

Research shows that pedophilic assaults are not more prevalent in queer households. In fact, the overwhelming majority of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by heterosexual men, often in positions of trust or authority, and most commonly within heterosexual family settings.

Here are key facts based on credible studies:

90–95% of child sexual abusers are male, and the majority identify as heterosexual.

Most perpetrators are family members or close acquaintances, not strangers.

There is no scientific evidence that LGBTQ+ people are more likely to abuse children.

Major organizations like the American Psychological Association and American Academy of Pediatrics have stated that LGBTQ+ people are not more likely to be child abusers.

This myth—often rooted in homophobia or misinformation—has been repeatedly debunked by psychologists, sociologists, and criminologists.

what about ideas of homosexuality in media besides porn?

ignores per-capita

focuses on how perpetrators "identify"

appeals to authority of captured institutions hamstrung by civil rights law and fear of reports of classifications as being "hateful" or "discriminatory."

cherrypicking

kek, seething at the facts wont make them disappear

Like what specifically? I don't think I mentioned this above, but I was 8 when I started messing around with my friend which would frame this in the time of 2001. What examples of homosexuality in media can you think of that an 8 year old would have had regular exposure to in 2001 to subconsciously inform their sexual development? Because I'll tell you god damn what, having regular sexual contact at 8 years old is infinitely more impactful to a developing brain than something I couldn't even point a finger at.

pointing out flaws in a presented argument is cherrypicking

begone, faggot

Change your ways, coomer. Unless the idea of getting buttfucked by Satan for all eternity sounds appealing

Most are gay through genes alone, but some have turned gay from molestation. Gays are also twice as likely to be pedos as straights.

Couple this with an extreme naivety on the part of boomer parents regarding internet use

Boomer parents cared more about making the internet safe for children than today's parents.

fellas is it gay to have friends and students

I just realized that I misread your post. You specified gay or tranny porn. Are you saying that you were watching "straight" porn before you were 8? Also, the exposure doesn't have to be regular. Just something introducing the concept of dudes touching each other's dicks, or even women doing gay shit together and you extrapolate that men could too. Are you being honest about how little oversight there was regarding media consumption for children of boomer parents? You probably got to watch whatever the fuck you wanted. Maybe you saw an episode of Oz, I don't know.

no, they cared about chatrooms and kidnapping and shit like that. they had no concept of porn-sharing technology.
gays would literally be over-the-moon if they could provide evidence for a gay gene. they haven't done it because it doesn't exist.

so you're saying

No, I'm not saying
I know somone who got molested and is gay, and he told me about this, that he had a hard time accepting himself because he thought that he became gay BECAUSE of what happened to him
However, his brother and his cousin all got molested too (same predator, an uncle of theirs)
Only one of them grew up to be gay. And he would have grown up gay regardless.

I never said it always turns you gay.
BTW does the uncle count as gay?

No arguments, no rebutal

Thanks for granting me victory
Seethe
What the fuck are you even talking about, schizo?

BTW does the uncle count as gay?

No, was a pedophile. Attracted to prepubescent boys who haven't developed their sexual characteristics, so they don't really count as men. Being gay is being a man and being attracted to men.
Additionally, he procrated with a women and lead a straight life to the public eye

I had only seen straight porn, which was usually just a picture of a naked woman for like 5 seconds, at any point leading up to the activity with my friend. Sometime afterward, I had started looking at lesbian stuff, but in the grand scheme of things, I didn't look at anything male/male until I was 17 or 18. I don't remember having a ton of rules about what I watched, but I genuinely never watched anything that wasn't on Cartoon Network when it was up to me up until middle school. Other nudity I remember seeing in tv/film was the three titted chick in Total Recall and the scene in Carnivale where the fat chick takes her top off and then gets killed.

Yeah yeah, we've all heard everything libtard talking points on the subject in the last 100 years. It's false. In reality sexuality is fluid, especially in developmental stages. You might say it's most fluid in gestation, and it's possible that can increase your susceptibility to unnatural sexuality, but it's far from the only time it is. The real deciding factor is development in youth through puberty. Obviously if your chromosomes are in order your body has a trajectory to develop into a proper male or female. There's nothing that can typically happen in the womb to really reverse course. But in life there's alot of terrible things that can push your masculinity down and turn you into a bitch. Androgeny or effeminacy in boys at a young age are often grown out of, given the proper development. But not everyone is. It's not necessarily molestation that's an over demonization, but I also don't trust an honest gay person to verify they were never molested since it's not uncommon for you to consciously forget that stuff especially in early childhood. But no I don't think it's the majority.

gay pedophile

somehow not gay

You are a dishonest person.
You saw porn. You're being vague about it and using qualifiers like "usually." How did you even see porn when you were that young? Someone showing it to you is basically soft molestation. You are almost word for word admitting to what I have said previously. I am literally being your chuddy psychologist right now, kek.

Or maybe you didn't get it and became gay because you're too low IQ to get it

I saw it via another friend of the same age. So then I would occasionally go to the site that he showed me, look at a picture for like 5 seconds and then close the window. I say usually because it could have been one of those preview clips that sites had, but since pictures were less risky I would usually not click on clips. There is no universe where my lived experience that I've been devoting hours of introspection over the years to piecing together has less credence then an umbrella theory that you dismissively apply to every case. There is a fundamental flaw in treating individuals like a collective unit. Keep in mind, I understand everything you're saying. It makes sense. It doesn't make sense in the context of my life and I have visited these theories many times over. I'm being vague because we both have different attention spans and I don't really feel like sitting here for an hour typing out a book with every minor detail I can remember just so you can lose interest after three sentences and give me a one sentence response with conviction claiming your outside perspective has more credence than the only reality I've ever known.

Jesus is literally God

No. Jesus was created so he's of different substance than God.

He's actually completely consubstantial with God. He is fully God and fully human.

exposed to sexually explicit material at a very young age, seemingly repetitively (which also indicates a household with lax standards of oversight, if not outright neglect. btw lack of attentive father is also linked to homosexuality/sexual aberrance.)

engaged in sexual activity at a very young age

porn usage continued through adolescence and progressed in type and frequency

The problem with you trying to discount my "umbrella theory" is that you check basically all the boxes. You are being evasive--probably because you recognize it, if only subconsciously.

He is actually The Son of God and part of The Godhead, along with The Holy Ghost and united in purpose with our Heavenly Father but a separate person.

Yeah, he wouldn't be called "Son of God" then, would he. "Son of" implies one person proceeds from the other.

Also, why would he pray to himself or be forsaken when himself withdraws from himself?

God is gay

What did HE mean by this?

I check all the boxes for what? Being gay? Having gay tendencies because I looked at porn when I was young? That I'm not actually gay, but porn made me like gay stuff? Honestly what are you even trying to say at this point?

Heretic Nicene headcanon.

you were mothafuckin molested

I mean acknowledged that in my first post.

How do you have fantasies about your friend's dick for "many years" before you're 8 years old?
What fucking 5 year old knows how to show another 5 year old a porn site on a computer?

Many years after we started doing stuff and before I started watching male/male porn.

What? Was the kid whose dick you sucked the same kid that showed you porn? You are all over the place, man. How in the world do you think you are proving me wrong about gays being a product of molestation?

dude leads the life of a straight man but because he molested a male boy straightoids try to lump him on us

No

for (you)

I agree with the idea that it is not a choice. In the Law of One, Ra says (I'm paraphrasing) that you are more likely to be gay in your current incarnation if you were the opposite gender in the majority (about 2/3) of your previous lives. (For example a gay man was more often born as a woman in previous incarnations.)

Same. I remember fighting with people on song meanings about it.

This is the problem with this kind of communication lmao. Different kids, but we are all the same age. Also I used the story as a means of supporting the idea because most people would see my case as molestation, but I didn't and still don't define it as such because molestation is inherently negative in my mind and my friend and I both opted in and enjoyed it. Someone earlier said it was molestation because children can't consent, which is basically saying my choice wasn't my own. It was, and I can say that with certainty. Also I can't really say that I regret doing it, or continuing for that matter, although I acknowledge that it definitely led to some arrested developments. Does that clear anything up? Anymore questions?

well, if he was the same sex as the "male boy" yeah

In a healthy world, with righteous adults around you, you wouldn't have been exposed to pornography or engaged in sexual activity with another child. You literally didn't even have the hormonal drive to be seeking out that kind of sexual activity. This is inherently negative, yes.
The fact that you can frame it differently in your mind is irrelevant.