/classical/

JJ edition
youtu.be/-ieSTNpxvio

This thread is for the discussion of music in the Western (European) classical tradition, as well as classical instrument-playing.

How do I get into classical?

This link has resources including audio courses, textbooks and selections of recordings to help you start to understand and appreciate classical music:
pastebin.com/NBEp2VFh

Previously, on /classical/:

JJ.jpg - 800x600, 85.46K

Barenboim? More like building a career off of the coattails of others, leeching off of your wife's talent and abandoning her when she gets multiple sclerosis so that you can fuck off to "teach" hack masterclasses on how to be a genius performer like you all the way safe in the knowledge that no one can criticise you because you'll pull both the "third world" AND the "jew" immunity cards

I mean more like dumdum or whatever

Eurovision

Not classical

Awful edition. Even Barrengoyim would've been better

You're right, let's not use this one.

I'm sure there are some reconstructions of ancient Greek music

>>/wpop/

Pietsch's musical style combines elements of opera and pop. As a "soprano" type of countertenor with a range reaching into high soprano heights, he explores both genres through an intense and expressive vocal and interpretative approach

JJ is a classical gay musician

did you really have to make two posts for that old-ass, unidiomatic recording?

Start 'em out with Karajan.
youtube.com/watch?v=_D6hG5HEVxo

What's the earliest music on record? Hildegard Von Bingen? Gregorian chant? Does that even count as western "classical"?
Does that count as part of the european academic canon, though? I know that not everything needs to belong to a "school" or a "period", but predating both seems to be contrary to the very idea of "western classical tradition"

old-ass, unidiomatic recording

I genuinely feel bad for you

Pietsch's musical style combines elements of opera and pop

But not as bad as I feel for OP. Get well soon.

Cameron Carpenter edition instead?

Do pederasts count as "gay" or is that just a completely different mental illness?

saintsaens.jpg - 1134x1600, 726.49K

If you mean the earliest recorded music of the Western style that would become or contribute towards the development of Western classical, then yes, it's Gregorian chant and beyond that, medieval polyphony. If you mean the earliest music with a self-conscious understanding of itself as classical music, then that's probably not until the eighteenth century.

In seriousness, when making recommendations to someone new to a piece, those types of recordings should never be suggested, no matter how good they are, because you wanna go with something that has the best chance of luring them in + gives them a good idea of what the work is all about, aka something with good audio quality and somewhat idiomatic. Recommending something like that is for when someone is asking specifically for your favorite and/or shows familiarity with the piece, ya dig? Like I would never recommend Celibidache to someone new to Bruckner, no matter how much I love his performances of Bruckner's music. Just my feelings on the matter.

Who cares. The earliest composer worth listening to is Machaut anyway

You guys hate him because he’s saving classical music and you don’t, jealousy is a bitch

I meant the former, yeah. I shouldn't be surprised, really. What comes after Von Bingen, would you say? Notre-Dame school? Pérotin?
I do. That's why I asked.

The Israeli candidate should have won

ok gay coomer

Shalom

If you're genuinely interested, read a book. Taruskin, for instance.

He’s based as fuck

IMG_1666.jpg - 1170x1882, 990.94K

He should display his pride flag in an Arab country.

luring them in

If you need to be coerced to like good things then you don't deserve to like good things. Start with the best recordings. Float or sink. Nobody's loss if they can't handle it.

The fool doesn’t realize Hamas would toss him off a rooftop

I just wanted to know what the earliest (non-fragmentary) examples of academic western canon on record (as in, recorded in a studio, not merely in historical record) are, and I got my answer.

Why are you saying “Shalom” are you Jewish?

I suppose I reject the premise that there are no recordings with quality audio which rank among the best, or at least worthwhile enough to suggest.

ok gay coomer
yes, I am jewish

So you are Jewish?

Ich bin auch ein Jude

yes, I, the poster of am jewish

cool it with the antisemitism guys and listen to Barenboim

Fuck off and die

Some of his conducting I can stomach, but his piano playing? Nope

He looks like the 'creepy chud'-coded character in a period drama for semi-literate middle class women.

Very old school.

Thank you Jewish sister

Austrian wants to drive Jews out of Europe

Guys I’m gettIng scared now

Can't stomach one of the GOATs

Antisemetism is a mental illness

Yup, it's nice. One review does end with

Bahrami is great fun to listen to with all his impressive wizardry, but it's more about Bahrami than Bach.

But again, I don't have a problem with that. What I don't like are recordings where the most frequently praised trait is its "clarity," ugh. Give me color, character, and expression any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

It's up there. It's like the Brahms 4 of solo piano pieces.

Brahms 4 of solo piano pieces.

Good point.

Does anyone here actually like Bernstein's Vienna Brahms and/or his later NY Tchaikovsky recordings with DG? I like slow tempi as much as the next guy and then some, but man, these push pass the realm of goods sense into perversity and grotesque indulgence.

samples if you don't know what's what

Tchaikovsky 5
youtube.com/watch?v=6t7D3SWyfIg&list=OLAK5uy_kVgFyvjaoz9gxZuWnRHnyHpjKKZkE1Qiw&index=9

Brahms 3
youtube.com/watch?v=eN9CIpddlc8&list=OLAK5uy_lSrCXpvVAebFoIAFZDFYyvxjrbp0Q20Qo&index=1

Like I love Giulini's slow tempo Brahms and Celibidache's is good, but these ones... man. I guess the question is, worth trying to acclimate myself to them, trying to find the value their vision, or discard them as to not waste any time on them?

Just between you and me, I'm pretty sure the sisterposter is Chinese, but I could be wrong. Anyway, have some respect for the dead.

It was Glen Gould playing the Allemande of the first partita of Bach

I could see in the thumbnail :p which is why I replied with different recordings of the same piece! But thank you, I appreciate you making sure.

Tintner is all the Bruckner you need

f.jpg - 350x350, 75.43K

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

His 3rd, 4th, and 6th are excellent, among the best. The rest? Either dreadful (the 5th) or the wrong version (the 8th).

now playing

start of Barber: Violin Concerto, Op. 14
youtube.com/watch?v=DSeyo7V8yAU&list=OLAK5uy_lw6mb3-L-AGoYwW6W9UQSn87Eo0Io3eb0&index=2

start of Barber: Souvenirs, Op. 28
youtube.com/watch?v=zwAHkWZn9bY&list=OLAK5uy_lw6mb3-L-AGoYwW6W9UQSn87Eo0Io3eb0&index=5

start of Barber: Piano Concerto, Op. 38
youtube.com/watch?v=Hv4QDEc97mc&list=OLAK5uy_lw6mb3-L-AGoYwW6W9UQSn87Eo0Io3eb0&index=10

youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_lw6mb3-L-AGoYwW6W9UQSn87Eo0Io3eb0

some Samuel Barber seemed appropriate for this clear and sunny American day.

barenboim has the best Bruckner 8

Which one?

Ok David

You're right about the 8th, but his 5th is one of the best I've ever listened to. What, you're not going to recommend Rozhdestvensky, are you

kek no, my favorite 5ths are Sinopoli and Karajan followed closely by Maazel. I listened to Tintner's 5th the other day and thought it was very dry, but on your recommendation I will give it another listen tomorrow or next.

see

Karajan is also one of the best 5s I've listened to, but I prefer Tintner. I honestly think it's so colourful and warm; can't imagine why someone would find it dry. As far as 8ths go, I prefer Wand (or Jochum)

I prefer Wand

see

le epic pepe reakshion xD

Kill yourself

I'll try

I just wanted to say "rendezvous at 0200 hours," so if not, no problem, I'm gonna revisit the Tintner either way.

wrong version (the 8th).

wat

His recording uses the original version of the 8th. If you like that one, then all the power to ya.

all the original versions are the best versions

In 1987 [Georg Tintner] moved to Canada, where he became director of Symphony Nova Scotia. In 1998, he was made a Member of the Order of Canada.[3] On 2 October 1999, after a six-year struggle with cancer, he jumped to his death from the balcony of his 11th-storey Halifax apartment.[4]

o_o

how Deleuzian of him

based

wtf I love Tintner's Bruckner now
base(d)-jumping amirite

now playing

start of Beethoven: String Quartet, Op. 59 No. 1 in F Major "Rasumovsky"
youtube.com/watch?v=EMWK0onXvhU&list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs&index=2

start of Beethoven: String Quartet, Op. 59 No. 2 in E Minor "Rasumovsky"
youtube.com/watch?v=PdfI_zydnK4&list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs&index=6

start of Beethoven: String Quartet, Op. 59 No. 3 in C Major "Rasumovsky"
youtube.com/watch?v=WzO8Zsfkf7g&list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs&index=14

start of Beethoven: String Quartet, Op. 74 in E-Flat Major "Harp"
youtube.com/watch?v=ALiz27XORaM&list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs&index=10

start of Beethoven: String Quartet, Op. 95 in F Minor "Serioso"
youtube.com/watch?v=_04OWZSUXKo&list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs&index=18

youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kmT0S1GO4L_a-j4V-lVh3v4D1V3l9ggNs

base(d)-jumping amirite

:p

I actually agree. All his revisions were the result of sycophants trying to "compose" vicariously through him, or edgy critics who didn't know what the fuck they were saying. My boy Bruckner got fucked left and right by friend and foe alike.